Legal Opinion

Rockwell International Credit Corp. v. Valley Bank

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1985No. 15726PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to determine the priority of competing security interests in collateral moved from one state to another. The district court ruled that a security interest held by Rockwell International Credit Corporation was prior to a security interest held by Valley Bank. For reasons explained below, we reverse.

The facts are undisputed. Valley Bank has a general security interest in “all equipment” of a debtor known as Curtis Press. Rockwell International Credit Corporation has a purchase money security interest in a particular item of equipment acquired by the debtor. Both…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Handy and Harman, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Konkel v. Golden Plains Credit UnionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Deposit Recovery Corp. v. SantiniCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API