Legal Opinion
Deposit Recovery Corp. v. Santini
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided November 2, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff-counter defendant, Deposit Recovery Corporation, has appealed from an adverse judgment in its suit against the defendants-counter-plaintiffs, Antonio San-tini and Carson Johnston d/b/a Shady Brook Angus.
The Case
Deposit sued Santini and Johnston upon a note which plaintiff purchased from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (F.D.I.C.). The complaint sought judgment for principal of $9,194.42, which included interest and attorney’s fee as provided in the note.
*765Defendants Antonio Santini and Shady Brook Angus pled a release executed by the Bank of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Richard M. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Donaldson v. DonaldsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Swallows v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. NemecekDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Willow Tree Investments, Inc. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Vinings Bank v. Homeland Community BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019