Legal Opinion
Beers v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 12, 1993No. 23, 24, 25, 26 M.D. Appeal Docket 1989, 117-120 M.D. Appeal Docket 1990, 121 M.D. Appeal Docket 1990, 138 M.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*608 OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY1, Justice.
The question presented is one of first impression: whether employees have standing to appeal a determination by the Office of Employment Security (“OES”) that certain fruit and vegetable processing operations are “seasonal operations” as defined by and pursuant to Section 802.5 of the Unemployment Compensation Law. 43 P.S. § 802.5. For the reasons that follow, we find that employees do not have standing to appeal a determination by the OES that certain fruit and vegetable processing operations are seasonal operations.
These thirteen consolidated appeals…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Franklin Township v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Franklin Tp. v. COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RESOURCESSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Jones Memorial Baptist Church v. BrackeenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hertzberg v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In Re DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In re T.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In RE NOMINATION OF deYOUNGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.