Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Tritt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 3, 1968No. 5-4486PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

In our original consideration of this ease, Ford Motor Co. v. Tritt, Admx., 244 Ark. 883, 430 S. W. 2d 778 (1968), we reversed the judgment entered in favor of appellee because there was no evidence in the record to show that the defect in the rear axle of the pickup truck was the proximate cause of the collapse of the wheel attached to the huh thereof.

On rehearing appellee contends that this court should not reverse a casé because of the exclusion of admissible evidence that was excluded at the request of the party claiming that the record is insufficient for lack of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. White v. MoffettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. TrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Zainudin v. MeizelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HearnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson & Johnson v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API