Legal Opinion

Johnson & Johnson v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1980No. CA 79-215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The circuit judge granted a new trial on the ground that a jury verdict for the defendants-appellants was rendered after the case had been removed to a federal court. We hold that it was at the urging of and in response to a motion by the appellees that the action of which they complained in a “mistrial” motion, occurred. The appellees were thus estopped from contending the trial judge erred. The ground for new trial asserted by the judge thus fails, and a new trial should not have been granted.

A second issue arises from appellees’ contention on cross appeal that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zero Wholesale Gas Co., Inc. v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. TrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Barber v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. TrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. BNSF v. Asbestos CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API