Legal Opinion

Carscallen v. Lakeside Highway District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1927No. 4794PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Bailey Lee, J.

This is an action for damages. Appellants plead that on or about June 15, 1925, they, being the owners of a certain barge, derrick, pile-driver and equipment of the value of $7,475, hired and bailed the same at an agreed rental to the defendant highway district, the defendant agreeing as part of the consideration to return the property so bailed in as good condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, as the same was in when delivered; that defendant “did not exercise reasonable diligence to protect and safeguard” said property while in its possession, and “was guilty of such negligence in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Stone v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wilson v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Julien v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Low v. Park Price CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Eschinger v. United Mut. Fire Ins.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Bryant v. Clearwater Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API