Eschinger v. United Mut. Fire Ins.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
This action was commenced by an individual and an insurance company. The individual will be referred to as the plaintiff. Plaintiff engaged defendant to make certain repairs to plaintiff’s automobile. While in possession of defendant the automobile was damaged by fire. The insurance company paid plaintiff the cost of repairing the damage and plaintiff and the insurance company brought this action to recover the cost of repairs plus damages for loss of use of the automobile while being repaired.
Plaintiff testified that he left his automobile with defendant late in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- W. B. Moses & Sons v. LockwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
- Royal Ins. Co. v. Collard Motors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Quinn v. Milner ex rel. Hartford Fire Ins.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Gamble v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Brandon v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Parking Management Incorporated v. JacobsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969