Harrington v. Tibbet
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Action for malicious prosecution. The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. Judgment was thereupon entered for defendant, and this appeal is from the judgment.
The complaint alleges that on the twentieth day of August, 1903, the defendant maliciously, intending to injure plaintiff in his good name and reputation, appeared before a justice of the peace of Riverside County, and without probable cause falsely charged plaintiff with having committed a felony,— to wit, with having obtained money under false pretenses. The complaint then…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dennis v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Shaul v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Bell v. KeepersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Hahn v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Stocking v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ray Wong v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Gogue v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Nally v. RichmondOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Cochran v. BonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Howe v. OwsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932