Legal Opinion
Arthur v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 22, 1991No. 1900220PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
575 So.2d 1191 (1991)
Ex parte State of Alabama.
(Re Thomas Douglas ARTHUR
v.
STATE).
1900220.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
February 22, 1991.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Andy S. Poole and William D. Little, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.
William Hovater, Tuscumbia, and H. Alan Gargis, Muscle Shoals, for respondent.
Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 575 So.2d 1165.
2Per curiam
WRIT DENIED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, ADAMS and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent.
HOUSTON, Justice (dissenting).
I think that this case is distinguishable from Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675, 108 S.Ct.…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Dooley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
4Cited by25 opinions
- Arthur v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Arthur v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Ex Parte LogginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.