Legal Opinion
Costello v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 9, 1965No. [No. 159, September Term, 1964.]Published
1Opinion of the Court
237 Md. 464 (1965)
206 A.2d 812
COSTELLO
v.
STATE
[No. 159, September Term, 1964.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided February 9, 1965.
The cause was argued before HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.
Charles W. Bell, with whom were Bell & Bell and John T. Bell on the brief for appellant.
Stuart H. Rome, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Leonard T. Kardy and Charles Foster, State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorney, respectively, for Montgomery County, on the brief, for appellee.
OPPENHEIMER, J., delivered the majority opinion of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Board of Medical Examiners v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Gleaton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Driver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.