Legal Opinion

Vanous v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1947No. 32246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, C. J.. Plaintiff in this action sought a judgment for a pension under the provisions of section 14-614, R. S. 1943. Issues were made, trial to a jury waived, and trial had resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and dismiss the cause.

The plaintiff was born October 8, 1889. He became a member of the regular police department January 10,1913. He served continuously thereafter until August 1933. On August 11, 1933, he was suspended and relieved from duty. On August 12, 1933, he tendered his resignation as a member of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Lincoln v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lickert v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Rishling v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fitzgerald v. KuppingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mollner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API