William E. ELMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPSTAN, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff employee, an African-American, initiated this Title VII action against his employer claiming his discharge for violating a work rule was the result of intentional discrimination based on race. The employee alleged disparate treatment, contending defendant disciplined non-minority employees more leniently for similar conduct. After a two-day bench trial, the district court found that while the employee had established a prima facie ease of disparate treatment, he had not established this treatment was the result of intentional discrimination based on race.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Rivera v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.