Legal Opinion
Neal v. Darby
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 22, 1984No. 0207PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Justice:
Appellants Walter Neal and Industrial Chemical Company, Inc., are engaged in the business of reclaiming used paint and industrial solvents. They challenged the constitutionality of a Chester County ordinance pertaining to the handling and storage of hazardous chemicals. Respondents Chester County and its county council members counterclaimed, alleging the company’s landfill site is a public nuisance. Following trial of that counterclaim, Neal and the company appeal the order in which the trial judge (who was assisted by an advisory jury) permanently enjoined further…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
- Strong v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Ravan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. City of FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.