Legal Opinion

Morales v. Portuondo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 24, 2001No. 97 CIV 2559 DCPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHIN, District Judge.

The writ of habeas corpus — the “Great Writ” — has been described as the “highest safeguard of liberty.” Smith v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708, 712, 81 S.Ct. 895, 6 L.Ed.2d 39 (1961). “[F]rom our very beginnings,” the writ has been a powerful remedy of last resort, the “[vindication of due process [being] precisely its historic office.” Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 401-02, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), abrogated on other grounds in Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1, 112 S.Ct. 1715, 118 L.Ed.2d 318 (1992). This case serves as a reminder of its historic — and…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BrunsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Morales v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. United States v. CamachoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Espinal v. BennettDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  5. Garcia v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API