Morales v. Portuondo
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
The writ of habeas corpus — the “Great Writ” — has been described as the “highest safeguard of liberty.” Smith v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708, 712, 81 S.Ct. 895, 6 L.Ed.2d 39 (1961). “[F]rom our very beginnings,” the writ has been a powerful remedy of last resort, the “[vindication of due process [being] precisely its historic office.” Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 401-02, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), abrogated on other grounds in Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1, 112 S.Ct. 1715, 118 L.Ed.2d 318 (1992). This case serves as a reminder of its historic — and…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BrunsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Morales v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. CamachoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Espinal v. BennettDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Garcia v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.