Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Camacho

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 1, 2001No. S1294CR.313(CSH)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.

Steven Camacho and Jaime Rodriguez were convicted of various racketeering acts in June of 1996 and now move pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Defendants submit an affidavit by Christopher E. Thomas, a federal prisoner, that describes a conversation in which Gregory Cherry, a fellow inmate, stated that defendants were convicted of crimes that Cherry committed. Defendants request that the Court grant a new trial based on Cherry’s statement. Defendants…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lopez v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Roebuck v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. United States v. BagchoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API