Grimes v. Kinney Shoe Corp.
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
SINGLETON, District Judge.
Erik Grimes (“Grimes”), a former employee of Kinney Shoe Corporation (“the Company”), sues the Company alleging that he was not paid overtime compensation due him under Alaska’s Wage and Hour Act, AS 23.10.050, for hours he was allowed to work “off the clock.” Specifically, Grimes contends that during the two-year period he managed the Company’s Sears Mall Footlocker store he worked as much as ten to fifteen hours off the clock each week for which he was not compensated. The Company disputes this claim, contending that Grimes was expressly limited to fifty…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Billy H. Forrester v. Roth's I. G. A. Foodliner, Incorporated, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Donovan v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Salazar v. Driver Provider Phoenix LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024