Legal Opinion

University of Nebraska at Omaha v. Paustian

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1973No. 39171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for Douglas County affirming an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Court en banc, which in turn affirmed an order of a single judge of the compensation court, awarding the plaintiff under the provisions of section 48-125, R. R. S. 1943, 50 percent additional compensation for delinquent payments. The payments involved are those for the period November 29, 1971, to September 17, 1972.

The propriety of the award under the facts of the case is not an issue on this appeal. The only issue here is whether section 48-125, R. R. S. 1943, is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abel v. ConoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Micek v. Omaha Steel WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Ray v. Sanitary Garbage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Gill v. HrupekNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Sunderland Bros. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Curtice v. Baldwin Filters Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Grandt v. Douglas CountyNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Thomas v. Omega Re-Bar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Thomas v. Omega Re-Bar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API