Legal Opinion

Sunderland Bros. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1920No. 20853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Charles Leslie, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtAldrich, J.

This is an action brought under section 6159-6164, Rev. St. 1913, known as the “Reciprocal Demurrage Act,” to recover demurrage alleged to be due from defendant railroad company for delay in forwarding and delivering carloads of sand and stone. These shipments were all intrastate. The court below rendered judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals the case to this court.

Section 6159, Rev. St. 1913, provides, among other things: “In less than carloads, not more than one cent per hundred pounds per day or fraction thereof with minimum five cents as damages, together with all other damages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atchison & Nebraska R. R. v. BatyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Graham v. KibbleNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Clearwater Bank v. KurkonskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hier v. HutchingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abel v. ConoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. LaBenz Trucking, Inc. v. SnyderNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. John F. Kealy and Robert M. Snell, Doing Business as Partners Under the Partnership Name of Mid-Plains Development Company v. Roger L. HarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. University of Nebraska at Omaha v. PaustianNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Abel v. ConoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API