Legal Opinion
Medley v. Runnels
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2007No. 05-55295PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
506 F.3d 857 (2007)
Theodore Beech MEDLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-55295.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 20, 2007.
Filed November 1, 2007.
Wayne Young, Santa Monica, CA, for petitioner-appellant Theodore B. Medley.
Robert M. Foster, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for respondent-appellee D.L. Runnels, Warden; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, were on the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Adrian Reyes v. Greg LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Adrian Reyes v. Greg LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Michael Bryant, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015