United States v. Michael Bryant, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1ConcurrencePaez, Circuit Judge
The conflict that presents itself again and again in this case is how to apply Nichols v. United States, 511 U.S. 738, 114 S.Ct. 1921, 128 L.Ed.2d 745 (1994), to cases like Bryant, where the government seeks to use uncounseled tribal court misdemeanor convictions as an essential element of a felony prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 117(a).1 The dissents from denial of rehearing en banc, along with two other circuits, urge a bright-line reading of Nichols that permits the use of these convictions as long as they do not violate the Sixth Amendment (which tribal court convictions, by definition,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Middleton v. McNeilSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Medley v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.