Steel Creek Development Corp. v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Plaintiffs have moved this Court to dismiss the appeal due to defendants’ failure to comply with Rule 28(b)(3) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Defense counsel has failed to comply with an elementary rule of appellate procedure requiring that he reference the exceptions and assignment(s) of error immediately following each question presented in the brief.
Failure to follow the rules jeopardizes a client’s case and we caution members of the bar to scrupulously follow the rules because appeals are subject to dismissal for such failures. However, this case will be decided on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Whalehead Properties v. Coastland Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Leake v. Sunbelt Ltd. of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Nelson v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Bradley v. Hidden Valley Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers & Capital Stock CompaniesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.