Legal Opinion

Neill v. Owen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1848PublishedCited by 9 opinions

— Appeal from DeWitt County. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lipscomb

The appellant Neill sued the appellee Owen, as administrator of Quin, for a specific performance of an agreement made and entered into between appellant and appellee’s intestate, by which the former was to receive one-fourth part of certain land claimed by the latter, in consideration of his paying the dues, etc., and obtaining the patent. The plaintiffs allege that the lands were situated in DeWitt county.

Owen, the administrator of Quin, pleaded in abatement in the court- below, that administration on the estate had been opened in the county of Yictoria, and that he was not liable to be sued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Birney v. HaimCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Knoles v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Dickson v. ScharffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Bondies v. BufordTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. McKay v. Marshall National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API