Birney v. Haim
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case' 87.
1Opinion of the Court
THIS is an action brought by the appellee, to recover of the appellant, the value of a lot, in the town of Lancaster, which had been conveyed by the appellant, with warranty, to Stephen Perkins, and by Per*263kins to the appellee, and lost by a paramount title, ánd is the same that was brought before this court on a for. mcr occasion, and reversed at the spring terrii 1821 ; in the report of which casé a more full detail of the circumstances may be seen.
It does not appear by any entry on the record, that the declaration was amended, after its return for fur, ther proceedings, pursuant to the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Collins v. StreitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Neill v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Silver v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Keyes & Marshall Bros. Realty Co. v. Trustees of the Canton Christian CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Smith v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.