Legal Opinion

Chalupiak v. Stahlman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeal, 74PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

Was the business relationship between the defendant, H. C. Stahlman and plaintiff, Paul Chalupiak of such a nature and character which required of defendant the duty of loyalty, fidelity and fair dealing and which precluded defendant from acquiring and enforcing an adverse title to real estate against plaintiff? The court below ruled that defendant owed no such duty and dismissed the bill. This appeal followed.

The commissioners of Beaver County purchased at the county treasurer’s tax sale a tract of land assessed as “land of James Moore Heirs”. There was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  2. LaBrum v. Commonwealth Title Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Henry v. RaimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  4. Hill v. FrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  5. Smith v. BrotherlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Kribbs v. JACKSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Horizon Financial, F.A. v. HansenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API