Legal Opinion
Richmond Redevelopment Agency v. Western Title Guaranty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1975No. Civ. 34255PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAZARUS, J. *
Respondent public agency commenced this proceeding in eminent domain to acquire title to the subject property in the City of Richmond for redevelopment purposes on June 5, 1972. In the original action, the defendants were Western Title Guaranty Company, Contra Costa County Division; Nubert “Babe” Dias; E. L. McFarland; the Sumitomo Bank of California; and Does One to Twenty.
The first three parties filed an answer and cross-complaint, the latter labeled as a “Cross-Complaint in Inverse Condemnation,” seeking, inter alia, loss of rental due to precondemnation activities by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Scott v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Charles C. Chapman Building Co. v. California MartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Feldesman v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Berger v. GoddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Redevelopment Agency v. Contra Costa Theatre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Taper v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.