Legal Opinion
Thornton v. AT & T Advertising, L.P.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 18, 2012No. 05-11-00767-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MARTIN RICHTER.
Attorney Appellant Robert Thornton (“Thornton”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in this breach of contract suit against AT & T Advertising (“AT & T”). After a trial on the merits, the trial court awarded AT & T damages in the amount of $21,620.29 plus attorney’s fees. In three issues, Thornton claims (1) there is legally no evidence of a valid contract between him and AT & T; (2) there is legally no evidence to support a breach of contract claim; and (3) there is legally no evidence to support an award based on quantum meruit For the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Sharifi v. Steen Automotive, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Dallas, Inc. v. BH DFW, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Iverson, Allen v. Dolce Marketing Group and DGI Ent, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Kyani, Inc., Todd Thompson, Scott Boulch, Volker Hartzsch A/K/A Mark Davenport, Brandon Stevens, and James Bradford v. HD Walz II Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
- Momentis U.S. Corporation v. Perissos Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Momentis U.S. Corporation v. Sheldon Weisfeld and Wesley Bishop, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014