Legal Opinion

Bee v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 12, 2009No. 20070804-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Judge:

{1 Plaintiff Michael Bee appeals several decisions of the trial court in his personal injury action against Defendants Anheuser, Busch, Inc. and Prominence, Inc. (collectively, Defendants). He asserts that the trial court erred by granting Defendants separate sets of peremptory challenges, by failing to question potential jurors regarding tort reform, and by disallowing the admission of evidence regarding Anheuser-Buseh's marketing and advertisements. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

2 During the 2002 Winter Olympics, Bee attended the Bud World Party and there participated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Randle v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Slisze v. Stanley-BostitchUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hall v. Process Instruments & Control, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Carrier v. Pro-Tech RestorationUtah Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyle v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Boyle v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  3. Boyle v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Boyle v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API