Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Christensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2011No. 20090822PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Mr. Boyle was hit by a truck and injured while walking in a crosswalk. Mr. Christensen, the driver, admitted Hability, but the case went to trial on damages. Not satisfied with the jury award, Mr. Boyle appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed the district court decision in all respects. Mr. Boyle sought certiorari review regarding three issues. He argues that (1) the district court provided inadequate voir dire questioning, (2) opposing counsel's improper reference to the "MeDonald's coffee case" 1 in closing argument warrants…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. DibelloUtah Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Turner v. Staker & Parson CompaniesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. J.M.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. BeckeringCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Smith v. Volkswagen SouthtowneUtah Supreme Court · 2022

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API