Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sanford Weinstock, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1998No. 96-2474, 96-2521PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Podiatrist Sanford Weinstock appeals from his jury conviction on twenty-six counts of mail fraud in connection with a scheme to defraud Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (“Blue Cross”) by filing claims for medical procedures that he did not perform. The government cross-appeals, claiming that the district court erred in declining to enhance Weinstock’s sentence.. For the following reasons, the judgment of the district court is in all aspects AFFIRMED.

I. BACKGROUND

Weinstock practices podiatry in Southeastern Michigan. On June 27,1995, the government indicted Weinstock on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Luis Salgado (99-5645) Wilfredo Jambu (99-5651)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Marlando Hardy (98-4500), Henry Green (98-4523), Anthony Rouse (98-4524), and Shuron Moore (98-4529)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Candy JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Keith ChurnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Steven L. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API