Legal Opinion
States v. Bridges
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 28, 1949No. 32117—RPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, District Judge.
During the course of the examination of the witness, John H. Schomaker, produced by the prosecution, the following occurred:
“Mr. Donohue: Q. Under the ruling of his Honor will you tell his Honor and the members of the jury your recollection of the conversation had at the time you and Herman Mann were present with Mr. Bridges at Mr. Bridges’ home?
“The Court: Have you specified the date?
“Mr. Donohue: Q. Did you state the date earlier ? A. It was in — it was in the latter part of October, 1933.
*15Mr. Hallinan: Now, your Honor, I want to make the objection which I said goes to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pearson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Clegg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Gilbert v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- United States v. BridgesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hallinan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- MacInnis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951