Legal Opinion

Erickschen v. County of Sibley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1919No. 21,078PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Tilomas Fitzpatrick and others petitioned the county board of Sibley county for the construction of a certain ditch. The reports of the engineer and viewers were confirmed by the board. M. S. Corrigan and others, who had filed objections, appealed from the order establishing the ditch to the district court for that county.

Read the full summary

Tilomas Fitzpatrick and others petitioned the county board of Sibley county for the construction of a certain ditch. The reports of the engineer and viewers were confirmed by the board. M. S. Corrigan and others, who had filed objections, appealed from the order establishing the ditch to the district court for that county. The appeal was heard before Tifft, J., who made findings and affirmed the order of the county board so far as it related to the drainage of the so-called Washington lake. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

On January 26, 1916, sixteen landowners of Sibley county petitioned the county board to establish and construct a drainage ditch. The petition states that wet lands along the route of the ditch require drainage to make them valuable for agricultural purposes, and that on such lands there are stagnant waters which give off offensive odors and breed disease.

The route of the ditch and its point of beginning and termination are set forth as coinciding with “old County Ditch No. T of said county, *39which has now become nearly extinct.” Appellant and six other landowners filed written…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Priewe v. Wisconsin State Land & Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lien v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Petraborg v. ZontelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. In Re Establishment of Judicial Ditch No. 75Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Jensen v. County BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. In Re Application of Baldwin to Vacate Lake StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Bloomquist v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API