Legal Opinion

In Re: Power Integrations, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 16, 2018No. 2018-144, 2018-145, 2018-146, 2018-147PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bryson, Circuit Judge.

Power Integrations, Inc. ("PI") has filed petitions for a writ of mandamus. The petitions challenge the decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board denying *1317 the institution of inter partes review of claims from three patents owned by Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC. We deny the petitions.

I

PI filed four petitions with the Patent and Trademark Office under 35 U.S.C. § 311 (b) requesting inter partes review of the claims of three issued U.S. patents. The patents share a priority date of June 4, 1997. The Board held that PI had failed to show that any reference…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. SAS Institute Inc. v. IancuSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LPSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  3. Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  4. In Re CISCO SYSTEMS INC.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  5. In Re MAXPOWER SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API