Legal Opinion
Juliano v. Federal Asset Disposition Ass'n (FADA)
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 4, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-0974-OGPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GASCH, District Judge.
This lawsuit was filed by William Juliano on behalf of himself and the United States pursuant to the False Claims Act (“Act”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. The Act allows the government to recover funds, civil penalties, and treble damages against those who knowingly present false or fraudulent claims to the federal government for payment or approval. William Juliano, the qui tam plaintiff, seeks a judgment against defendants to recover, for the benefit of the United States and himself, damages of more than $75 million (before trebling), plus civil penalties and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Thomas Earl DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Ettrick Wood Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kevin G. Kelly v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States of America, Ex Rel., Max Killingsworth v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States ex rel. Sequoia Orange Co. v. Baird-Neece Packing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States Ex Rel. Amin v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.