Legal Opinion
Johansson Corp. v. Bowness Construction Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 22, 2004No. CIV. CCB-03-1750PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
The defendant, Bowness Construction Company, has moved to dismiss the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Johansson Corporation, for lack of personal jurisdiction. The issues in this motion have been fully briefed and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss will be denied, but the case will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
BACKGROUND
Johansson Corporation (“Johansson”) is a Maryland corporation, with its principal place of business in Baltimore,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dring v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Hausfeld v. Love Funding Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Aphena Pharma Solutions-Maryland LLC v. BioZone Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Under Armour, Inc. v. Battle Fashions, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Haley Paint Co. v. EI DuPONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.