Paris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against E. W. Paris. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
Separate indictments were found against the defendant below, F. W. Paris, and his wife, Mary Paris, for the same alleged violation of Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act Dec. 14, 1914, c. 1, 38 Stat. 785 (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q). The charge against each of them was that in the county of Oklahoma, in the Western district of Oklahoma, he and she on January 12, 1918, carried on the business of a dealer in opium and cocoa leaves, and the derivatives, compounds, and preparations thereof, without first having paid the special tax therefor, and without registering with the collector…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Hall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Bruce BonnettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. George BroadwayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. William Earl BurkhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Haskell Edward Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.