Legal Opinion

Hetrick v. Keeney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1986No. 153,250; CA A35783PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He alleged that his counsel in an earlier post-conviction proceeding failed to provide adequate assistance because he did not raise certain issues and did not appeal the adverse judgment. In this case, the trial court granted summary judgment for defendant. We affirm.

The grounds for post-conviction relief are found in ORS 138.530(1). As relevant to that case, they all must involve “[a] substantial denial [of a constitutional right] in the proceedings resulting in petitioner’s conviction, or in the appellate…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Page v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Hetrick v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Dotta v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Gordon v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API