Dotta v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.
Petitioner appeals the dismissal of his second petition for post-conviction relief. He alleged that, when he was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree and kidnapping in the second degree, he was deprived of the right to a jury trial, did not validly waive the right to a jury and was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. He had entered pleas of guilty and no contest. We affirm.
ORS 138.550(3) provides, in relevant part:
“All grounds for relief claimed by petitioner in a petition pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680 [for post-conviction relief] must be asserted in the original or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Hetrick v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Hetrick v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Dotta v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Gordon v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Martz v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992