Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Burman v. Bell & Howell Phillipsburg Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 27, 1997No. 954257Published

1Opinion of the CourtHouston, J.

Plaintiff Caroline Burman (Burman) brought this action alleging unlawful discrimination based on sex, sexual harassment, and unlawful retaliation in violation of G.L.c. 151B against Bell & Howell Phillipsburg Co. (Bell & Howell), Kenneth Tripp (Tripp) and John Tarascio (Tarascio). Burman also asserts claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress against the defendants. Defendants now move for dismissal of Counts I (sexual harassment under c. 151B) and IV (retaliation under c. 151B) against Tripp and Tarascio, Count II (sexual harassment under c. 214, § 1C) against all defendants,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Charland v. Muzi Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API