State v. Vogt

■VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

Lane Vogt appeals the denial of his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. On appeal, Vogt claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion because: (1) his continued incarceration constitutes a manifest injustice in that his convictions were secured in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights; and (2) his trial coun sel’s failure to advise him of a Fourth Amendment defense rendered his guilty plea involuntary. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Lane Vogt pled guilty to…