Legal Opinion

Dominick v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 22, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

New tidal. Evidence. Witness. Practice. Before Judge Harris. Coweta superior court. March term, 1888. Eeported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

Dominick was convicted of arson, in January. At the following March term of the superior court, he made a motion for a new trial. The motion being an extraordinary one, the ground of newly discovered evidence is the only one that is important. This newly discovered evidence consisted mainly of declarations made by some of the State’s witnesses, tending to show *716that they committed the offence, and had conspired to accuse Dominick. The judge of the superior court who tried the case and who heard the motion, having denied a new trial, this court is not disposed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Polite v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Creswill v. Grand Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Atlanta Paper Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Emory v. Grand United Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API