Loomis, Inc. v. Cudahy
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-respondent Loom-is foreclosing a mechanic’s lien against the home of defendant-appellant Cudahy. We reverse and remand.
*460Cudahy hired Simth, an architect, to design and supervise the construction of a house. Upon the recommendation of Smith, a contract was entered into with one Griffin for the construction of the house. Griffin was required to furnish a performance bond in connection with his contract to construct the house and that performance bond was issued by Ronald W. Liese and Liese & Associates Insurance,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Gavica v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Idah-Best, Inc. v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Palmer v. Idaho Bank & Trust of KooskiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. LawhornIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Crabtree v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1982