Legal Opinion
United States v. Arturo Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 27, 2005No. 04-16663PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
Arturo Hernandez appeals his convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute two kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride, and possession with intent to distribute two kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride. 18 U.S.C. § 2; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. Hernandez argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, the district court erroneously denied his motion for a new trial, and his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment, under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because the evidence was sufficient…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Buenaventura Martinez, Juan Martinez, Jaime B. Salcedo, United States of America v. Manuel Suarez-O'neillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Ruby Conway v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Henning v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SpoerkeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Bishop CapersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BastonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.