Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water Company v. Hild

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1966No. 40769Published

1Opinion of the Court

415 P.2d 970 (1966)

METROPOLITAN WATER COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Harold H. HILD and Margaret E. Hild, Defendants in Error.

No. 40769.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 17, 1966.

Leon C. Hirsh, James C. Harkin, Paul Johanning, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Bailey & Whitlock, Norman, for defendants in error.

Morton Y. Loar, Berry & Berry, Oklahoma City, for amici curiae Richard P. Finley and wife.

HODGES, Justice.

This action was commenced by Metropolitan Water Company, the plaintiff, to establish and foreclose a mechanic's and materialman's lien against property owned by Harold…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mann v. SchnarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Bangor Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Robbins Plumbing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  5. Berry v. BarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API