Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Distler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Augustus B. Kelsey and others, from an-interlocutory judgment of the Supreme- Court in favor of the defendants Bistler and Van Inwegen, entered in the office of the ‘clerk of the county of Kings on the 18th day of February, 1910, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term, sustaining the said defendants’ demurrer to ' the amended complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Cabe, J.: ,

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint. The original complaint was likewise demurred to, and the demurrer sustained by the Special Term, whose decision was affirmed by this court on the opinion of the trial court. (Kelsey v. Distler, 133 App. Div. 916.) The question involved in this appeal is whether the complaint as amended-states a cause of action against the defendants Bistler and Van Inwegen, w,ho again demur, the defendant Hodges having answered. The amended complaint is somewhat voluminous, but it's salient facts may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelsey v. DistlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rachmani Corp. v. 9 East 96th Street Apartment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Stendig, Inc. v. Thom Rock Realty CompanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Gratwick v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Bidwell v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. Eastern Consolidated Properties, Inc. v. Adelaide Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API