Legal Opinion

Rachmani Corp. v. 9 East 96th Street Apartment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1995PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rubin, J. P.

This controversy arises out of the conversion of premises known as 9 East 96th Street to a cooperative housing corporation. The sponsor, Borchard Affiliations, Inc., entered into a contract for sale of the premises to the proposed cooperative *264corporation, 9 East 96th Street Owners, Inc. (Owners), on April 1, 1980. An offering plan was filed with the New York State Attorney-General’s office on August 11, 1980 by the sponsor. The plan identified The Rachmani Corporation as the exclusive selling agent for units owned by the cooperative housing corporation.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of MontrealNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Laba v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Palmetto Partners, L.P. v. AJW Qualified Partners, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Curtis Properties Corp. v. Greif Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Bua v. Purcell & Ingrao, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API