Legal Opinion

Gratwick v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

Prior to August 28, 1912, three attorneys, Carl T. Chester, the defendant and the plaintiff, occupying offices at 914 Ellicott square in Buffalo, were doing business in the name of Chester, Smith & Gratwick. That name was on the office door, on their stationery and on legal papers in actions or proceedings conducted by them.

In the years 1906 and 1907 Mr. Chester and Mr. Smith in the name of the firm conducted a proceeding in the Erie County Surrogate’s Court to probate the will of Pendennis White, deceased. Under date of July, 1907, a bill for $5,000 was rendered by the firm against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. King v. . LeightonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Claim for a Ring of Van Slooten v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Consaul v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Murray v. MumfordNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  5. De Wolf v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. MaineNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Buscaglia v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
  3. Chisholm v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Buscaglia v. Tax Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
  5. Lowery v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API