Legal Opinion
Nobel Insurance v. Hudson Iron Works, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 21, 1999No. 98 Civ 4815(RMB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nobel Insurance Company (“Nobel”) has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed.R.Civ.P.”), against defendants Hudson Iron Works, Inc., James Giannopoulos, Cathy Gianno-poulos, Philippos Kapnisis and Melani Kapnisis (“Hudson Defendants”).
For the reasons set forth below, Nobel’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. 1
I. BACKGROUND
The relevant facts are as follows. On or about August 24, 1993, the Hudson Defendants, among others, executed a document styled Application for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Readco, Inc., R.D.P. Associates, Lan Associates Xii and Antonio Reale v. Marine Midland Bank Eagle Rock Holding, Inc., a New York Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Slatt v. SlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hans Tupper Barboza v. Doreen Ann Hughes JironDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Nobel Insurance v. Hudson Iron Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- State Insurance Fund v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002