United States ex rel. S.C.I. Construction Co. v. Gajic
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s, Ray Ga-jic’s (“Gajic”), motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
Gajic, the prime contractor, was awarded the contract for construction of a Norwood Park post office. Under provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a(a)(2), he furnished a bond for the protection of those supplying labor or material. Gajic entered into a subcontract with Dragon Construction. Dragon, in turn, entered into a contract with S.C.I. Construction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- David Avery v. United States of America, and Pacific Drydock and Repair Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Avanti Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Faerber Elec. Co., Inc. v. Atlanta Tri-Com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Trio Forest Products, Inc. v. FNF Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Mason v. Southern Sanitation, Inc. (In Re Underground Storage Tank Technical Services Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- US FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF SCI CONST. CO., INC. v. GajicDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988