Legal Opinion

Trio Forest Products, Inc. v. FNF Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 16, 1994No. 2 CA-CV 94-0071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary determination by the trial court holding that appellant Trio Forest Products, Inc. (Trio) had no claim against appellees FNF Construction, Inc. (FNF) and its surety, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., (National Union), under the Arizona Little MiUer Act, A.R.S. §§ 34-221 through 34-226. We reverse.

Arizona enacted the Little MiUer Act in 1969, modeling it after the Federal MUler Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a through 270d (the Federal Act). Both acts require that a general contractor on a pubUc project post a bond to ensure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. JW Bateson Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Advance Leasing & Crane Co. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Honeywell, Inc. v. Arnold Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. SCA Construction Supply v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. General Acrylics v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. R.E. Monks Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. S & S Paving & Construction, Inc. v. Berkley Regional InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. RE MONKS CONST. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. S&S Paving v. BerkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API