Beets v. Chart
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C,
The appeal in this case was attempted to be taken without having attached to the transcript any *186certificate of the clerk identifying the papers contained in it as having constituted a part of the record of the court below.
The settlement of what is called “ a statement on appeal to the supreme court,” made after a motion for a new trial had been heard and determined, is not provided for in the code. (People v. Crane, 60 Cal. 279.) It does not appear to have been certified, settled, or signed by the judge of the trial court, and cannot therefore be considered here either as a statement…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. McPhersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
- Candelas v. RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
- Garner v. MeizelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Candelas v. RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
- Reynolds v. 2013-3 SFR Venture CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015